top of page

See related products

See related products

What's the difference between tilt and fixed solar panel mounts?

How do tilt mounts differ from fixed solar panel mounts?

Fixed solar panel mounts are stationary systems where panels remain at a set angle year-round, while tilt mounts (adjustable or tracking) allow manual/automatic angle adjustments to follow the sun’s path for improved energy capture. The core difference lies in flexibility, efficiency, and operational complexity.


Key Differences

1. Angle adjustability

  • Fixed mounts: Set at a fixed angle (typically 30-40° in the UK for optimal year-round exposure).
  • Tilt mounts: Allow seasonal adjustments (e.g., 15° winter tilt vs. 50° summer tilt) or automated tracking (single-axis systems).

2. Energy output

  • Fixed mounts: Simpler but less efficient, producing ~20% less energy annually than tracking systems.
  • Tilt mounts: Adjustable versions boost output by up to 20% vs. fixed mounts; advanced trackers add ~25-30% efficiency.

3. Cost and maintenance

  • Fixed mounts: Lower upfront cost (£50-£200 per panel for basic UK ground/roof systems), minimal maintenance.
  • Tilt mounts: Higher initial investment (£300-£800+ per panel for trackers) and ongoing costs (servicing motors, sensors).

UK-Specific Considerations

Climate Adaptations

  • Weather resilience: Fixed mounts handle UK high winds and rain better due to fewer moving parts.
  • Seasonal light: Adjustable tilt (manual) works well for Britain’s latitude (51-55°N), where summer solar altitude reaches ~60°.

Practical Examples

  • Home use: Most UK households use fixed mounts (e.g., south-facing 35° roof pitches) for simplicity.
  • Small businesses: Farms/warehouses with ground space often opt for tilt systems to offset higher daytime energy demands.

Pros and Cons

Fixed mounts

  • Pros: Cheaper, durable, low upkeep.
  • Cons: Suboptimal output in winter/dawn/dusk.

Tilt mounts

  • Pros: Higher ROI in sunny regions (e.g., southern England), better for limited-space installations.
  • Cons: Complex installation, prone to storm damage (e.g., 2022 Eunice winds), may require planning permissions.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  1. Overestimating savings: Tilt systems rarely justify costs for sub-4kW home installations in cloudy regions (e.g., Scotland).
  2. Ignoring maintenance: Trackers require bi-annual servicing (~£150-£300 per visit) often overlooked in budgets.
  3. Poor orientation: Fixed mounts on north-facing UK roofs can underperform by 30-50%—always prioritize south/east/west placements.

Recent UK Developments

  • Smart Energy GB reports: Rising use of adjustable-tilt mounts in new-build homes (2023) to meet stricter Part L building regulations for energy efficiency.
  • Grants: Scotland’s Home Energy Scotland Loan now covers tilt systems for rural businesses under their "renewable infrastructure" category.

Advice for owners: Start with fixed mounts unless you have high daytime usage (e.g., workshops) or live in high-sun areas. For tilt systems, prioritize manual-adjust models to balance cost and efficiency.

bottom of page