top of page
See related products
See related products
What are the drawbacks of current bidirectional charging tech?
What are the limitations of current bidirectional charging technology?
Bidirectional charging allows electric vehicles (EVs) to send stored energy back to the grid (V2G) or power homes (V2H). However, adoption in the UK faces significant technical, regulatory, and financial hurdles. Below are the key limitations:
1. Limited Vehicle and Charger Compatibility
- Few compatible EVs: Most UK-market EVs only support basic “vehicle-to-load” (V2L) for powering devices, not full V2G/V2H. Exceptions include newer Nissan Leaf models and Ford’s AC bidirectional system.
- Specialised chargers required: Bidirectional chargers like Wallbox Quasar cost £3,000-£5,000, compared to £500-£1,000 for standard chargers.
2. Grid Regulations and Safety Standards
- Grid connection rules: Bidirectional chargers must comply with G99 regulations for grid export, requiring costly certification and grid operator approvals.
- Automatic shutdowns: Safety protocols force bidirectional systems to disconnect during grid failures, reducing the reliability of backup power.
- No universal standards: A mix of CHAdeMO (Nissan) and proprietary systems (Ford) creates fragmentation, slowing large-scale deployment.
3. Economic and Logistical Barriers
- Unclear financial returns: While bidirectional charging could save UK households up to £190/year by 2040, upfront costs (chargers, installation) often outweigh short-term savings.
- Tariff limitations: Few energy suppliers (e.g., Octopus Energy) offer bidirectional-friendly tariffs, reducing incentives for homeowners.
- Battery degradation concerns: Frequent charge/discharge cycles may increase battery wear, though evidence remains inconclusive.
4. Practical Challenges for Users
- Installation complexity: V2G chargers typically require three-phase power, which many UK homes lack.
- Grid capacity issues: In areas with limited grid headroom, local networks may restrict bidirectional exports.
- Insurance and warranties: Some insurers and manufacturers still exclude bidirectional use from policies or battery warranties.
5. UK-Specific Developments
- Policy gaps: No mandatory bidirectional compatibility rules exist for new EVs or chargers, unlike solar panel standards.
- Recent progress: Ford’s Intelligent Backup Power (for home energy storage) and Nissan’s Leaf V2G trials with Octopus Energy highlight early commercial use cases.
Key Pros and Cons for Homeowners
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Lower electricity bills via smart tariffs | High upfront costs (£3k-£5k per charger) |
Backup power during outages | Limited EV/charter compatibility |
Supports renewable energy use | Regulatory complexity and delays |
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Assuming all EVs are compatible: Most mainstream models (e.g., Tesla, VW) lack bidirectional capabilities.
- Overlooking grid permissions: Always consult your Distribution Network Operator (DNO) before installing a bidirectional charger.
- Ignoring tariff options: Opt for specialised tariffs like Octopus Intelligent Flux to maximise savings.
For small businesses, bidirectional charging could enable fleet-based energy storage but requires careful cost-benefit analysis due to higher energy demands and scalability challenges. As the UK grid evolves to accommodate more renewables, resolving these limitations will determine whether V2G becomes a mainstream solution or niche offering.
bottom of page